Pledging
These are the original issues in this subcategory
- COURTROOM TV
- SCOTUS TERM LIMITS
- JUDICIAL ETHICS
Although most of our judges are beyond reproach, there still remain cases of judicial misconduct. Judicial misconduct occurs when a judge acts in a way that is unethical or violates the judge's obligations of impartiality. From 2008 to 2019, there were more than 5,000 cases in which judges resigned, retired or were publicly disciplined following accusations of misconduct. However, unlike all other federal judges, Supreme Court Justices are not bound by a code of ethics. Most believe transparency and ethics are vital to the integrity of the judiciary and keeping the public’s trust in our courts – particularly as attacks on judicial independence and the rule of law have become more common.
Critics claim it has been apparent the Supreme Court operates with too much secrecy and too little transparency, endangering the public’s confidence in the impartiality of its justices. Polls now show the majority of Americans no longer believe the Court is impartial, deciding cases on politics rather than law. Examples of outright corruption include a former colleague of U.S. Chief Justice John Roberts' wife filing a complaint with Congress and the Justice Department alleging her work as a legal recruiter poses a conflict of interest at the Supreme Court. And it was recently discovered that Justice Alito flew to Alaska on a private jet for a fishing vacation in 2008 paid for by billionaire Paul Singer who had business before the Court. Justice Clarence Thomas has faced calls to recuse himself on a number of issues and cases over the conservative political activism of his wife, Ginni, who supported overturning the 2020 election. One recent report describes a close relationship between Thomas and prominent Republican donor Harland Crowe.
That report states that, for the past 20 years, Thomas has neglected to disclose his acceptance of luxury gifts and extravagant trips on Crow’s yacht and private jet. Crowe also paid the tuition expenses for Thomas’ child and bought property from him at inflated prices, including the house where Thomas’ mother now lives rent-free. Justice Neil Gorsuch, sold a massive property he co-owned to the CEO of a law firm that often argues cases before the court. Critics say that, given the historic misdeeds of our judicial system, we can only restore faith in our highest court by requiring Supreme Court justices to adhere to the same standard of ethics as other federally appointed judges.
The Supreme Court recently adopted its first code of ethics, but critics say this new policy does not impose any significant new requirements, leaves compliance entirely to each justice, and lacks a means of enforcement.
Pending Legislation: S.1814 - Supreme Court Ethics, Recusal, and Transparency Act of 2025
Sponsor: Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (RI)
Status: Senate Committee on the Judiciary
Chair: Sen. Chuck Grassley (IA)
Tweet
Critics claim it has been apparent the Supreme Court operates with too much secrecy and too little transparency, endangering the public’s confidence in the impartiality of its justices. Polls now show the majority of Americans no longer believe the Court is impartial, deciding cases on politics rather than law. Examples of outright corruption include a former colleague of U.S. Chief Justice John Roberts' wife filing a complaint with Congress and the Justice Department alleging her work as a legal recruiter poses a conflict of interest at the Supreme Court. And it was recently discovered that Justice Alito flew to Alaska on a private jet for a fishing vacation in 2008 paid for by billionaire Paul Singer who had business before the Court. Justice Clarence Thomas has faced calls to recuse himself on a number of issues and cases over the conservative political activism of his wife, Ginni, who supported overturning the 2020 election. One recent report describes a close relationship between Thomas and prominent Republican donor Harland Crowe.
That report states that, for the past 20 years, Thomas has neglected to disclose his acceptance of luxury gifts and extravagant trips on Crow’s yacht and private jet. Crowe also paid the tuition expenses for Thomas’ child and bought property from him at inflated prices, including the house where Thomas’ mother now lives rent-free. Justice Neil Gorsuch, sold a massive property he co-owned to the CEO of a law firm that often argues cases before the court. Critics say that, given the historic misdeeds of our judicial system, we can only restore faith in our highest court by requiring Supreme Court justices to adhere to the same standard of ethics as other federally appointed judges.
The Supreme Court recently adopted its first code of ethics, but critics say this new policy does not impose any significant new requirements, leaves compliance entirely to each justice, and lacks a means of enforcement.
Pending Legislation: S.1814 - Supreme Court Ethics, Recusal, and Transparency Act of 2025
Sponsor: Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (RI)
Status: Senate Committee on the Judiciary
Chair: Sen. Chuck Grassley (IA)
Tweet
- I oppose reforming current judicial ethics policy and wish to donate resources to the campaign committee of Leader John Thune (SD).
- I support imposing a binding, enforceable code of ethics on Supreme Court justices by: 1.) Requiring the Supreme Court to adopt a formal and publicly accessible code of conduct within 180 days of the bill's enactment. 2.) Establishing a procedure for filing ethics or misconduct complaints against justices. These complaints would be investigated by a five-judge panel of circuit court chief judges, which would make recommendations back to the Supreme Court. 3.) Mandating new financial disclosure requirements for justices and their law clerks. These standards would be similar to those followed by members of Congress. 4.) Expanding the circumstances under which a justice must recuse themselves from a case. This includes a six-year lookback period for financial ties or significant campaign contributions from parties or those with an interest in the case. 5.) Requiring justices to publicly explain their recusal decisions. 6.) Requiring parties and amicus curiae (friend-of-the-court) groups to disclose financial contributions they have provided to a justice in the two years prior to a case. This aims to reveal potential financial influences behind legal arguments. 7.) If a motion to disqualify a justice is filed and the justice does not recuse themself, the challenge would be sent to a review panel of the other Supreme Court justices. And wish to donate resources to the campaign committee of Sen. Chuck Grassley (IA) and/or to an advocate group currently working with this issue.
- I support imposing a binding, enforceable code of ethics on Supreme Court justices by:
1.) Requiring the Supreme Court to adopt a formal and publicly accessible code of conduct within 180 days of the bill's enactment.
2.) Establishing a procedure for filing ethics or misconduct complaints against justices. These complaints would be investigated by a five-judge panel of circuit court chief judges, which would make recommendations back to the Supreme Court.
3.) Mandating new financial disclosure requirements for justices and their law clerks. These standards would be similar to those followed by members of Congress.
4.) Expanding the circumstances under which a justice must recuse themselves from a case. This includes a six-year lookback period for financial ties or significant campaign contributions from parties or those with an interest in the case.
5.) Requiring justices to publicly explain their recusal decisions.
6.) Requiring parties and amicus curiae (friend-of-the-court) groups to disclose financial contributions they have provided to a justice in the two years prior to a case. This aims to reveal potential financial influences behind legal arguments.
7.) If a motion to disqualify a justice is filed and the justice does not recuse themself, the challenge would be sent to a review panel of the other Supreme Court justices.
And wish to donate resources to the campaign committee of Sen. Chuck Grassley (IA) and/or to an advocate group currently working with this issue.
You May Pledge Your Support For This Issue With A Monetary
Donation And By Writing A Letter To Your Representatives
Donation And By Writing A Letter To Your Representatives
Please login to pledge
Pledge Period - Opening Date
October 20, 2025
Pledge Period - Closing Date
October 26, 2025
Trustee Election - Begins
October 27, 2025